By: Maya Lakhani
Edited by: Olivia Yzerman
Is ethical fashion genuinely different from fast fashion, or simply a rebranded version of fast fashion itself? Fast fashion, built on mass production, cheap labour, and constant new trends, has drawn criticism for its environmental and social harms. To counter this criticism, major brands now market “ethical” or “sustainable” lines that claim to promote fair wages, eco-friendly materials, and transparency. Yet, these promises often disguise the same exploitative systems that define fast fashion. This article claims that the difference between fast fashion and what is marketed as ethical fashion is largely superficial, since both depend on overproduction, inequality, and consumer manipulation rather than genuine reform. To understand this dynamic, it is first necessary to ask: What is fast fashion, and why have brands decided to pursue ethical fashion to counter it?
Fast fashion has become increasingly popular through brands such as Shein and Zara. By marketing their products at extremely low prices, these companies make it tempting for consumers to see fast fashion as an easier alternative to higher-priced clothing. However, this practice has been heavily criticized, as fast fashion fuels exploitation and reproduces harmful systems for workers. This is because fast fashion operates on a model of mass production and global outsourcing to keep prices low and stay ahead of rapidly changing trends. Brands release new micro-collections weekly, relying on suppliers in low-wage countries to meet the relentless demand for cheap clothing. However, this comes at an environmental cost, as the fashion industry is responsible for around 10 percent of global carbon emissions, which is more than all international flights and shipping combined. A study also shows that social and environmental burdens of production (chemical waste, unsafe working conditions, water contamination) become concentrated in the Global South, where communities are forced into bearing the cost of the Global North’s consumption.
That being said, many companies now advertise their use of ethical practices to attract customers by claiming it is better for the people and the planet. However, this claim is often used as just a marketing strategy rather than genuine reform, as numerous “sustainable” labels continue to operate within the same exploitative global system. Ethical fashion is presented as clothing produced under fair labour conditions, using sustainable materials and transparent supply chains. These claims appeal particularly to younger consumers, who are increasingly conscious of climate change and social inequality and want their purchases to reflect their values. According to a recent study, the fashion industry claims they practice sustainability, but in reality, its waste and pollution have barely decreased. Oftentimes, this is just a form of greenwashing, which is a strategy to attract consumers while maintaining traditional profit models. For example, a study examined brands that claim to be sustainable but practice the opposite. They found that H&M’s “Conscious Collection” supply chains remain opaque and less than 1 percent of its materials are actually recycled.
H&M is not the only brand using sustainability language to maintain its image. Zara’s “Join Life” collection, for instance, is labelled as environmentally conscious, but continues to rely on massive, high-volume production that undermines any real progress. Even Shein has recently begun rebranding itself through resale platforms and recycling programs to appear more sustainable. Yet, despite these claims, Shein still releases more than 6,000 new styles every day, making its promises impossible to fulfill. These examples show how both fast fashion and supposedly “ethical” brands now use the same sustainability rhetoric to appeal to eco-conscious consumers while preserving the exploitative structures that make their profits possible. As a result, the fashion industry has blurred the line between “fast” and “ethical” fashion, as major fast-fashion brands now market themselves as sustainable while continuing the same harmful production practices.
Does ethical fashion actually differ from fast fashion, or does it just double its effects in a more discreet way? Despite its progressive language, ethical fashion remains embedded in the same global system of overproduction and inequality that defines fast fashion.
A study that supports this finding shows that transparency and modern slavery reports are often written to reassure Western consumers rather than to protect workers in the Global South. They state that, “modern slavery reporting often prioritizes corporate image over workers’ realities.” Similarly, another article finds that power imbalances between larger brands and their suppliers still continue, as suppliers are often the ones paying the price to meet new “sustainability” demands. Evidently, these studies show that ethical fashion has not removed the exploitation built into the global fashion industry, but rather reinforced it by repackaging it in a more appealing way.
The spread of so-called “ethical” fashion not only fails to fix the harms of fast fashion, it often makes them worse by masking them. When brands market sustainability without real reform, they allow overproduction and exploitation to continue and create a false sense of progress that discourages deeper systemic change. Consumers feel they are making ethical choices, but in reality, their purchases still fuel pollution, waste, and underpaid labour in the Global South. Ultimately, ethical fashion doesn’t reduce harm, it multiplies it by making exploitation more invisible and socially acceptable. The system sustains itself by turning environmental concern into another form of consumption, reinforcing the very cycle it claims to resist. Real change would require slowing production, paying living wages, and reducing consumption altogether. However, these steps threaten the industry’s profit model. To summarize, ethical fashion remains less of a solution and more of a sophisticated disguise for the same exploitative system.
Image Citation: Pexels. (2016). Apparel Boutique Bags [Photograph]. Pixabay.com. https://pixabay.com/photos/apparel-boutique-bags-shoes-shop-1850804/
References:
Bick, R., Halsey, E., & Ekenga, C. C. (2018). The Global Environmental Injustice of Fast Fashion. Environmental Health, 17(1), 1–4. BMC. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12940-018-0433-7
Crumbie, A. (2024, April 9). What is fast fashion – and why is it a problem? | Ethical Consumer. Ethical Consumer. https://www.ethicalconsumer.org/fashion-clothing/what-is-fast-fashion-why-it-problem?
Guardian staff reporter. (2019, December 19). Conscious, ethical and cruelty-free: a guide to the language of sustainable fashion. The Guardian; The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/fashion/2019/dec/19/conscious-ethical-and-cruelty-free-a-guide-to-the-language-of-sustainable-fashion?
Igini, M. (2022, August 24). 5 Fast-Fashion Brands Called Out for Greenwashing. Earth.org. https://earth.org/fast-fashion-brands-greenwashing/?
Lin, A. (2022, August 5). Driven to Shop: The Psychology of Fast Fashion – Earth Day. Earth Day. https://earthday.org/driven-to-shop-the-psychology-of-fast-fashion/?
Maiti, R. (2025, January 20). The Environmental Impact of Fast Fashion, Explained. Earth.org. https://earth.org/fast-fashions-detrimental-effect-on-the-environment/
Nguyen, N. (2023). Fast Fashion & Greenwashing: The Worst Combination for Sustainability. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/373632703_Fast_Fashion_Greenwashing_The_Worst_Combination_for_Sustainability
Perry, P., Osburg, V.-S., Huq, F. A., & Diallo, M. F. (2024). Fashionable Ethics: Exploring Ethical Perspectives in the Production, Marketing, and Consumption of Fashion. Journal of Business Ethics, 196(4). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-024-05913-7
Pucker, K. P. (2022, January 13). The Myth of Sustainable Fashion. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org/2022/01/the-myth-of-sustainable-fashion?
Richards, H. (2022). Risk, Reporting and Responsibility: Modern Slavery, Colonial Power and Fashion’s Transparency Industry. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 11(2), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.5204/ijcjsd.2378